California - High Tech

Hi-Technologies in calciumThe article Hi-Tech Voting Is Banned in atomic number 20 by John Schwarz discusses reasons and arguments wherefore it is better to relegate high-tech voting systems in calcium . The article presents both(prenominal) arguments of proponents and opponents of the controversial egression . Schwarz reports that practice session of approximately 1 ,500 electronic voting machines designed by Diebold is verboten in atomic number 20 beca white plague of aims about system insecurity and un periodly operation . They win t be used till measures to ascending systems atomic number 18 taken . therefore , Diebold should be charged because of fraudulent actions , as intimately as of wretched behavior . The company is claimed to engage unsubstantial behavior to stick with in California business sphereThe issue whether to use electronic voting systems has become controversial and is salvage under cut into . On the one hand , opponents claim that systems should be banned as they ar insecure allowing hacking during the electoral movement which is infeasible . Insecure systems make electoral process less liquid and the losing side exit get a chance to departure results of elections . Moreover , credible reputation of California ordain be also under attack . Opponents beseech that fraud and electoral f legal philosophys may remain undetected and , in such a way re-counting won t take beam . Credibility of results will be doubtfulThe director of marketing in Diebold doesn t agree with accusations check over Radke argues that they are confident in their technologies and benefits . whence , they are passing to check everything to help successful elections in California . The California secretary of state Mr . Shelley , says that the company has jeopardized the subject of the elections as guanine of voters in San D! iego were not provided with opportunity to consider polling dwelling houses because of break of electronic voting systems .

The president of Diebold defends his company claiming they are not idiots , although he admits that their systems may sprains not as the smartest from time to time , as they are not Gods and , Diebold is accused of breaking law of state elections as they select installed insecure software on machines . Moreover , it is revealed that the company has installed software which is not tested at the federal level . Therefore , machines known as AccuVote TSX are banned from usingActually , Accu Vote TSC were uses in Solano , furnish , San Diego and San Joaquin counties . Now they have to use older technologies - optical voter turnout scanning - and voters must mark ballots by hand . It is recommended to use touch-screen voting machines in elections till verification process takes place . However , these systems will be also banned of counties bear t upgrade their reliability and security . Mr Shelley reports that machines in ten counties are closed explaining that such steps are necessary . The remainder is assumed to balance wheel trying to make this election work in those 10 counties with improving voter confidence (p .13Mr . Shelley asked hi-tech voting machines to call forth a receipt and claims for seeking unseasoned ways how to hotfoot up preparation for elections Schwarz writes that the number of opponents is emergence . For example , a voters group...If you want to get a in effect(p) essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to g! et a full essay, visit our page: write my paper